Why do senior marketers struggle to prove content’s ROI?

Because most content is static, marketing teams are stuck between two bad options when trying to prove content ROI:

  • Relying on static PDFs that kill engagement and can’t prove ROI.
  • Shiny microsite platforms that don’t fix the content problem at its core.

If your content isn’t directly tied to revenue, you’re not proving marketing’s value. You’re reporting vanity metrics while sales runs the boardroom.

When should you choose Turtl vs Folloze?

You should choose Folloze if you’re interested in a microsite approach, where you need to house various links and existing assets, a digital lobby, if you will. Choose Turtl if you need to personalize the actual core of your ABM campaign: think deep-dive guides, sales proposals, and reports at a scale that manual microsite building can’t really touch. Turtl is for teams who know that in ABM, the quality and relevance of the content itself is what makes the difference in performance.

Go-to-market philosophy

  • Turtl
    Elevates the content asset itself. Every eBook, sales deck, or proposal becomes interactive, trackable, and revenue-proving. The mission: close the gap between content and revenue.
  • Folloze
    Orchestrates personalized buyer experiences. AI-powered microsites and digital sales rooms to fuel ABM campaigns. The mission: turn signals into action, fast.

How do Turtl and Folloze compare

While both Turtl and Folloze focus on enhancing B2B content experiences, they approach the challenge from different angles.

While Folloze specializes in orchestrating the environment around the buyer, Turtl personalizes the journey inside the asset. In an ABM context, Folloze acts as the delivery vehicle (the microsite), but Turtl acts as the precision-guided payload. Turtl enables 1:1 personalization for 1,000 accounts,  ensuring that every stakeholder in your target account sees content that addresses their specific pain points, not just a generic PDF.

Feature Turtl Folloze
Content creation

Intuitive editor with templates

Rated 9.0 on G2

Create 50+ content types

Real-time editing, even after publishing

No design/coding skills needed

No-code designer for microsites


Rated 7.5 on G2

AI “Generator Agent” creates content/campaigns

Flexibility limited; may require HTML/CSS

Personalization

Patented Personalization Engine creates thousands of tailored docs from one template

Perfect for High-Scale/ Programmatic ABM where you need deep relevance across hundreds of accounts simultaneously

AI "Personalize Agent" and "Intent AI" curate journeys across channels 

Strong for one-to-one ABM orchestration, less about scaling document assets

Analytics focus

Deep behavioral analytics

Tracks 1,251 reader signals per session

Dashboards at team, document, and reader level

Benchmarking against peers

AI "Impact Dashboard" generates account engagement scores

Segments accounts as Active, Growing, or Surging

Strong predictive sales intelligence

Business value

Shows why content works, what converts, and how it fuels pipeline

Content strategy + revenue clarity

Surging accounts convert 5x more often

Prioritization tool for sales engagement

Sales collateral

Personalized, trackable proposals and decks

Customer story: 85% win rate on bids (Peoplesafe)

Digital Sales Rooms = microsite hubs for all sales collateral, demos, and comms 

Modern ABM toolkit

Enablement style

Enhances the asset

Empowers sales-led ABM. Sales teams can generate and track their own personalized, brand-governed decks and proposals to close high-value accounts faster

Provides an environment

Sales runs orchestrated, multi-stakeholder deals

Why is Turtl the stronger choice for teams who must prove content ROI?

With Turtl, content isn’t just a container for campaigns, it’s the asset that drives pipeline. While Folloze is built to orchestrate ABM microsites and digital sales rooms, it doesn’t fix the core problem: proving the ROI of the content itself. Turtl does. 

What can teams actually do with Turtl that Folloze can’t match?


-> Create content that sells using our drag-and-drop editor. No coding, no waiting on design.

-> Personalize at scale with our patented engine, turning one template into thousands of tailored assets.

-> Embed video, interactivity, and links to keep buyers engaged longer. 

-> Push content anywhere (email, sales outreach, social, web) without extra build time.

-> Track every interaction (1,251 reader signals per session) and feed data straight into CRM/MAP.

-> Get revenue recommendations on what to double down on, based on actual performance.

-> Prove ROI with behavioral analytics and CRM integration.

-> Automate 1:1 ABM: Link your CRM to Turtl to automatically generate custom content assets for every target account on your list, featuring their logo, industry data, and specific pain points.

Instead of spending cycles building digital experiences that look polished but don’t prove impact, Turtl makes every asset revenue-ready. Scale faster, stay consistent, and finally show the numbers that matter.

So… which should you choose, Turtl or Folloze?

Both platforms solve different problems and ultimately, the choice depends on where you want your personalization to live.

If your strategy relies on building digital "lobbies", packaging various existing links and files into a single microsite, Folloze is a strong option. It is an environment for hosting content you already have.

However, if you want to win at ABM through content relevance, Turtl is the better option. Turtl doesn’t just build the room; it transforms the conversation. It allows you to move beyond "personalizing the link" to personalizing the actual story for every account, at a scale Folloze cannot match.

Choose Turtl if you want to:

  • Scale ABM effortlessly: Turn one master template into 1,000+ bespoke documents for your target accounts.
  • Fix the revenue content gap: Stop sending static PDFs that hide your buyers' intent.
  • Prove financial impact: Get the deep, behavioral data needed to show exactly how your content influenced the deal.

For marketers who want to move past vanity engagement and start driving revenue justice through high-impact, personalized ABM, it’s time to try Turtl.

TURTL VS FOLLOZE FAQS

Can I use Turtl for a 1:1 ABM strategy?

You can absolutely use Turtl for 1:1: ABM. In fact, many Tier-1 ABM teams use Turtl specifically for high-value accounts because it allows them to create deep, immersive content that feels like a bespoke microsite but is actually a singular, paginated asset. This makes it easier for buyers to consume, share internally, and for you to track which specific chapters (like "Pricing" or "Implementation") a specific stakeholder is reading.

Does Turtl replace the need for ABM microsites?

Yes, it often does. While Folloze builds a hub for multiple files, a single content asset created with Turtl can serve as a comprehensive, interactive destination that houses video, text, and data in one cohesive story. For teams that find microsites too fragmented or difficult to build, Turtl offers a more streamlined, content-first approach to the buyer experience.

Does Turtl offer the same ABM orchestration features as Folloze?

No, Turtl does not offer the same ABM orchestration features as Folloze; they serve two different, yet complementary, roles in an ABM strategy.

  • Folloze is purpose-built to be the ABM orchestration hub. It creates, manages, and automates multi-touch ABM journeys and complex digital sales rooms across multiple channels, which is ideal for teams running large, high-budget ABM programs.
  • Turtl focuses on strengthening the content that powers those journeys. It creates the engaging, personalized, and analytically deep content assets (like personalized eBooks, proposals, and decks) that actually prove revenue impact.

-> ABM with Turtl

Is Folloze a replacement for Turtl?

No, Folloze and Turtl solve completely different problems, even though they both sit in the GTM stack. Folloze builds AI-powered ABM microsites and digital sales rooms, but it doesn’t improve the content inside them or prove its ROI. Turtl elevates the content asset itself, making every document interactive, measurable, and revenue-focused.

Can Folloze personalize documents the way Turtl does?

No, Folloze can personalize the microsite experience and surface relevant assets, but the underlying PDFs, decks, and eBooks remain static. Turtl’s patented engine personalizes the content itself, at scale, generating thousands of 1:1 tailored versions from a single template.

Which platform gives clearer ROI proof?

Turtl gives clearer ROI proof, hands down. Folloze tracks account-level engagement and intent scoring, which is useful for prioritization, but it stops short of showing what inside the content influences pipeline. Turtl tracks behavioral signals, maps those to CRM data, and tells teams exactly which assets, chapters, and messages drive revenue.

Ready to see it in action?

Don’t waste another quarter proving clicks while sales proves revenue. Speak to Turtl today and start turning your content into pipeline fuel.

a-cute-anthropomorphic-turtle-wearing-tie-compr